Online Fintech Lending (and Gambling) Is a Pain in The Ass

 (Warning: Strong languages and rants ahead)

 

                  Imagine yourself working hard day and night to earn a decent living wage to either sustain yourself or to fulfill your dreams of buying stuff or go on your dream vacation using your hard-earned money. You might be feeling rewarded after all those work that you put in day in and day out. Now imagine that same money, instead going into some sketchy things like online gambling. Even worse, you lost substantial amount of money on those online gambling sites and ended up taking online loans. Now that is a recipe for disaster.

 

                  I want to stress two things in this piece: One, your financial condition is the product of your own management. And two, everything nowadays needs money, even just for menial things. Nowadays, with recent technological innovations, you can easily access your bank accounts from your smartphone. And that includes getting a loan. Online lending has become a recent trend in today's financial world. This can roughly be traced to the recent pandemic, where the world suddenly stopped running itself. When money is tight, and you need a quick buck, you can just download an app that allows you to access quick loan for a decent amount of money with various payment options. This can also apply to online shopping, specifically with the "buy now pay later" scheme. 

 

                  Sure, this will ease the burden of paying right away for purchases or for someone who in dire need for a quick buck in tight situations, but there is a dark, disturbing and possibly disgusting underbelly that has plague this section of the financial industry. Since the lenders and the lending party are anonymous, some criminal-minded asswipes would purposely take some loan and proceeded to not pay the loan. And that is probably the worst thing that could happen if you are the one who is giving the loan, but this is not what we are here for. 

 

                  Let me just say this to set this up for you dear readers: ONLINE FINTECH LENDING IN INDONESIA IS A CESSPOOL FULL OF MONEY-HUNGRY CAPITALISTS AND HEARTLESS DEBT COLLECTORS. There, I said it. Online lending is by far the most accessed financial service in Indonesia, which is in itself, is regulated by the Financial Services Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan/OJK). You might be thinking, since it's regulated, these online fintech companies can just adjust their rates to the regulation, right? You are DEAD. FUCKING. WRONG. Even when the relevant organization is established to regulate themselves, the AFPI, or Asosiasi Fintech Pendanaan Bersama Indonesia (Indonesian Fintech Lending Association), these heartless motherfuckers behind these online lending apps always find their way to terrorize their customers.

 

                  There are two ways online lending apps did to trap their customers. One, is to formulate an interest rate that looks convincing enough that the consumer who got attracted started using their services, usually for extra cash to buy anything and everything imaginable. Currently, the interest rate is at 0,4%. But here's the kicker: The app can set whether that 0,4% can be applied daily, monthly, or even weekly. This then, allow the total fund to be returned to snowball to a point of impossibility. Imagine you borrow IDR1 million, only to find the number swelling to around IDR 3 to 4 million after interest. And that's not all, sometimes, the payment window can be set to the minimum time possible. Making the customer's effort to pay all those debts even harder. They then, were forced to seek another loan to pay off those debts, and when the payment is due, they scrambled to find another lending app to pay off another debt, not realizing that the debt could only grow rather than shrink. It's like digging a hole to cover up another hole.

 

                  And what happens when the customers fail to pay them on time? Debt collectors then spawn from the deepest parts of hell. Supposedly, debt collectors are task to remind the customers of their payments and/or collect those payments face to face. Then, what's the kicker then? These collectors often use their position to terrorize their customers into paying their debts, often with a mounting interest. And these bastards are quite heartless as well. There are too many cases of online debt-related suicide over the past 4 years. All with similar motives: They are tired of being hunted by debt collectors and their own debts. I can still recall a sensational case that once went viral on X (Twitter) about a man who took his own life over his debt. The story went like this: The man borrowed roughly IDR9 million through Adakami, one of the "legal" fintech apps under OJK, only to discover that the fund he needed to return snowballed so much, it was twice as the initial loan, at IDR18 million. It was speculated that either the interest rates or the administration fee that were manipulated so extensively to cause that number to increase. Knowing this, the man tried to pay off all those debts, but soon find himself out of money. And that's where the calls started. Initially the calls only come to him or his family, but somehow, the collectors managed to reach his place of employment, causing him to be fired unceremoniously. And instead of stopping, the Adakami debt collectors then deploy their sinister tactics, by flooding this man's address with fictitious online food orders, online shopping packages, even some mundane services like the waste management and even fire fighters and ambulances. The neighbors were kind enough to take those orders, but good things can't last, and in the end, the man took his own life because of the massive debt. But even after his death, the collectors still terrorize his family. If that does not constitute someone's behavior as heartless, I don't know what is.

 

                  And this is not limited with apps that only have online collectors. Field collectors can cause massive damages as well. Some apps have commissioned either internal field collectors or third-party vendors to assist them. And usually, these ones that cause a massive pain the ass. One time, a bunch of field collectors once camped outside a debitor's house to demand the payment of their debts, often causing distress to the consumers themselves. And they are willing to dumb themselves enough for the sake of a bonus paycheck to degrade, harass, even insult the debitors. Some of these fellas often not certified and only paid cheaply. And once they got arrested for causing a disturbance, the fintech app that hire them would swiftly disavow them. Those who do work for them often got away with a slap on the wrist, ready to torment another person for another day.

 

                  But what does is the correlation between these assholes and online gambling? Back to the statement early, quick buck for quick buck is needed for someone to participate in online gambling. They started small, and after gathering a good amount of winnings, they started to bet bigger and bigger, until they realize that they lost too much, they need quick cash to continue playing. This is where online fintech entered the fray. The player thought by borrowing an innocent amount of money, they can win back the loss, only to suffer more loss and their debts piling up. And when they realized that they would never win anything back and becoming addicted as they did it, it would be too late. Debts piling up and they have to sell everything to cover their loss, while destroying themselves and their families in the process. Granted, these people got into online gambling through influences by other people, often times through ads on social media. Not only that, but several recent investigations also revealed that there are major players that associate themselves with this illegal online gambling sites, mostly government official and even some law enforcement brass. The sad part is the majority of online gambling players are blue collar workers and those who fell below the poverty line. A combination of those factors could only lead to disaster of epic financial proportions.

 

                  I have friends who are either currently battling or already paid off their debts, and most of them are online fintech debts. I can’t help them all the time, but I can relate to some experiences, since I lend some money to some people in the past. Some paid me back, some didn't. But to waste all of your hard-earned cash on online gambling and turn into online lending, both legal and illegal, is nothing short of a stupid, destructive move you've ever done. Save your money for important events and stop screwing around with things like gambling.

A Little Insight into My "World"

 

(Warning: Strong languages, mentions of self-harm and suicide ahead)

 

 

Quite frankly, I don't want to sit and write this. But this has been a burden on my side, and I want to release it once and for all. Everyday, every minute I really wished that I would be someone walking in the background, unnoticed, undetected. Sometimes I even wish that I don't really exist. I simply wished that I was never born at all. I don't expect you to understand, but for me, I would rather stay in my bedroom for hours doing things that would please myself, rather than engaging with the society. Don't get me wrong, I still have family, friends, even a girlfriend. But sometimes, being alone, or spend some time with the one that would love you unconditionally and no questions asked is the best way to escape the burden of being alive.

 

During my childhood, I was a misfit. Even if I wanted to play with some of my colleagues, all I get was rejection or a cold shoulder. I spent most of my childhood living with my grandmother, and to this day, she is the only one I feel most comfortable with. If my grandpa would still be here, he would have been the second person that I can freely interact with. I never understand how friendship works, and how to manage it. Hell, I don't even know what I was back then and to this day, no matter how much I try; I am still struggling getting know of myself personally. Overtime, all I know is I might have massive number of friends or relatives, I always a lonely person inside. My grandma said to me once that it's like I am living inside my own bubble. And frankly, I'm okay living inside this bubble, as long as I'm comfortable with it. Most of my years of my life, this "world" that I'm living at is mine and mine alone. But thanks to certain someone special, she is now part of my world, my inner bubble. The one that I can freely express my thoughts and grievances about life.

 

The fact that I have an untreated mental condition doesn't help the case either. As far as I remember, I never visit a single psychiatrist apart from the time I was diagnosed with ADHD when I was 5 years old. Everything that I do must always be wrong in the view of others, even my parents. I have always wanted to tell you this, but I guess that all those words that coming from my mouth are useless to you apparently, but I am struggling to control this otherwise uncontrollable physical body and this brain of myself. It's involuntary, and the urge is sometimes irresistible. The impulse is out of control. Not to mention that in the heat of the moment, when my mind is so focused on one thing, several other important things are pushed to the side. As a result, I can be quite forgetful of those things. But I am now come to terms that I am always an idiotic waste of space. Yes. I am an idiot. I just happen to be an idiot with a bachelor’s degree. I'm not lazy, I'm just an idiot. Not that it would matter anyway. Afterall, I only do things for the sake of others, not me. And I'm fine with that. 

 

My relationship with my parents is kind of an up-and-down affair. Sometimes we get civil with each other, but most of the time, it's tiring with all the scolding, shouting and any of that "tough love" bullshit. Especially with my father. For him, there is something wrong with whatever I do. Even some chores I did must always have some flaw. Like the floor that is not clean enough (but let's face it, my father is a MASSIVE clean freak). My mother on the other hand, when it comes to personal relationship, is more like "just a friend" type. We rarely talk about much unless it's about important matters. Moreover, since I lived with my grandma for the most of my childhood, I rarely meet them. They are either working or study in college (my mother was a medical student when she got married). So, in return, I never feel really close with them emotionally. There is a lot of emotional distance developed between them and me. I guess my brother has better luck when it comes to this, huh? Good for him. That's why I prefer to shut myself out. You can't get scolded for doing something wrong if you didn't do anything in the first place, right? Sometimes, when I get scolded (or yelled at, with a tiny sprinkle of threats of violence), I thought, "If you don't want a kid like me with all this disability or doesn't want anything to do with me in the first place, just tell me. I would gladly take my own life by stabbing my chest with a knife straight to the heart, for the sake of liberating you from this humongous burden." Hell, I always have this urge to at least bang my head as hard as humanly possible to a nearest wall, preferring some sharp edges, so I can cut myself more quickly and easily. But I guess that won't kill me fast enough. But yeah, if you are tired of me, I'll just kill myself then. Afterall, I'm nothing but a dead weight.

 

"But they are your parents." Yes, they are. But loving parents don't spew threats of violence just because of some garbage that I forgot to put away because of sudden distracting impulse that I can't control. Loving parents don't constantly compare two siblings just because the other one is "squeaky clean and an accomplished kid" and the other one is "a useless waste of space". If this is what it turned out to be, I'd rather be aborted as a fucking fetus than being born this way. Nobody was asked to be born. I didn't ask to be born. In this case. I'd rather be alone in a crowded space than being in the same place as my parents to be completely frank. 

 

Naturally, with every single shit that I have to endure, I had to seek some external output just to temporarily relieve myself from my home life. From plucking fingernails to the point of constant bleeding to practically seeking pleasures outside of home become the main part of my life. Hell, on weekdays, especially when my father is around, I've always made sure to leave the house to work a bit early and go back from work a bit late. So that at least I have as minimal interaction as possible. 

Marissa Matthews: The Fat Woman with the World's Biggest Victim Complex

 (Warning: Strong languages and rants ahead)

 

 

            To start this piece, let's recap (again) about what body positivity movement, or at the very least, what REAL body positivity really is. It's a movement aimed for people born with different bodies as a result of either a genetic condition, body forms, and irreparable injuries, be it amputations, scars from either fire or various accidents. That being said, according to some people, fat bodies should be included inside the body positivity agenda, aimed to destigmatize fat people amongst the societal life. In paper, this is a noble cause, but in reality, this is a total trainwreck. I have to apologize in advance, because in this piece, I'm about to go loose cannon on this subject matter.

 

            And from this movement, which nowadays resembles more like a undrivable shitbox of a rusty car rather than a well-oiled machine akin to a Le Mans Hypercar, came slew of "fat activists" who honestly, weigh more than all 20 Formula 1 drivers combined. (In)famous names like Virgie Tovar, Tess Holliday, even a shit-for-brains nutritionist Linda Bacon (I know she goes by the name of Lindo Bacon and the "they/them" pronouns but fuck it) who first coined the term "health at every size", which in Mortal Kombat terms, is like the Shang Tsung or Shao Kahn of body positivity/fat acceptance movements. Some of them don't even used the term "fat bodies", instead opted to use "marginalized bodies". I have to say this to open your eyes, BUT YOU ARE THE MOST PRIVILEGED CLASS OF THIS WORLD, YOU FUCKING LARDASS. 

 

            Onto the subject of this piece, and the information are a lot scarce than I anticipated. But this living cannonball is infamous for her horrible takes (some even said that it's either downright hilarious or offensive) when it comes to body positivity. Her name is Marissa Matthews, and she is from Ottawa, Canada. She is most active on TikTok (God, not this forsaken app again), with most of her content consist of either "what I eat in a day" videos, flaunting her flabby bits or responding to "hate speech" and "fatphobia" with real hate speech and body shaming. Her mouth is deadlier than the Chernobyl nuclear powerplant, the Fukushima nuclear reactor, the Merapi volcano and the supertanker oil spill combined.

 

            Let's take a look at some of her takes on body positivity, and I have to remind you, dear readers, that I have burned millions of my brain cells just to provide this for your entertainment. On one video, she replied to one of the comments from someone who lost weight after living their life as a fat kid reminding her of the long-term danger of obesity by saying "I don't care about you or your life... your experience does not warrant harassing me with unwanted health advice and your opinion on my body". First of all, you pea brain, they just wanted to share their experience to REMIND you of how dangerous being fat in the long run, not to harass your privileged, fat ass! 

 

            One of her signature bad takes is the difference between fat shaming and skinny shaming. According to her, fat shaming is rooted in systemic oppression, whether racism, homophobia, transphobia, and all of those leftist trigger words that other "activists" like to spew, while skinny shaming is simply bullying. Other takes including that the body positivity movement is founded by black LGBT fat people, hence those bogus connections. I have to call bullshit on that, because falling too far on either side of the scale is as equally dangerous as the other one. If you are too skinny, or even anorexic for that matter, is dangerous due to low food and energy intake to the point of constant starvation. In short, being too skinny could kill you if you underfeed yourself. What you perceive as "skinny", is what we as a normal society called "fit" or "normal". Whilst being too fat is equally dangerous, partly because instead of underfeeding, you overfed yourself and never paid any attention to your daily calorie intake. If you passed a point of no return, it would slowly kill you through complications on your body as a result of piling body fat. And for the second take, body positivity is meant to support EVERYONE WHO FEELS UNCOMFORTABLE INSIDE THEIR OWN SKIN. I have to reiterate that the movement, in its face and core values, meant for everyone with different bodies as a result of genetic deformities or disabilities be it from accidents or irreversible injuries. And the movement also open for literally everyone, whether black or white, straight, or gay or bisexual, and for everyone across the globe. Apparently, Marissa's head is so far up her own ass, that anything or everything she perceived is viewed through the lens of "fatphobia" would be deemed as such, even if the comments she read is as harmless as a falling leaf.

 

            And I guess that's just her brand of content, responding to some comments (remember, these comments are in no means harmful, just some PSA on the dangers of obesity with a bit of harmless trolling sprinkled on the side) with pure hatred, malice, and nonchalantly harass other people with differing opinions (and body size with various degrees of real disabilities) and brand them in one fell swoop as fatphobic. And this, in turn, landed her in trouble multiple times with TikTok, who deleted some of her comments for harassment and bullying. And what did she do? She blamed it on the app for deleting her comment and the commenter for getting her own comment axed for harassment. Yeah, talk about grace and poise right there. She is also a bit fucked in the head when it comes to the definition of "boundaries and consent". She loves to preach about those two topics, but in reality, she's a double standard holding bitch who apparently doesn't bother to respect other people's boundaries and always have her two cents about her "valid opinions" for those who do not want them. And she delivers them unsolicited. I can safely say that she has a planetary-sized victim complex if I've ever seen one. 

 

            And you are probably thinking, "is this woman even serious?" And unfortunately, she is as serious as she come. And come to think of it, at least some of the "fat activists" currently plaguing this God's green Earth is "strong and independent boss babes", but not poor Marissa Matthews. She is the exact opposite of the mantra, despite her manhole of a mouth spewing otherwise. She is actually a 27-year-old unemployed sloth who lives with her mother. And to top it all off, her mother is a textbook example of an enabler. Yes, we are dealing with a dependent fat woman and her enabling mother who sees nothing wrong in her "poor little baby". I know I said something about a mother's unconditional love, I discussed it while talking about Achraf Hakimi, which is a totally different story, but the way I see it, it's not love, it's borderline abuse. The mother literally set Marissa up for failure and an early death. 

 

            I really want to talk more about this trainwreck of a woman, but I am too burnt out to even consider continuing my research for this piece, not while losing more brain cells and IQ points along the way. All I can say is that Marissa Matthews is a textbook example of an ignorant, privileged fat activist who sees everything in one dimension, and dismissing other opinions by framing them as "fatphobia", while also weaponize her victim complex to avoid responsibility, even when the evidence is clear, and all stacked against her. Remember, if you want to be wherever you are, be my guest. But don't force your opinion on someone just because you view yourself as the most important person on the Internet. And one more thing. Don't be Marissa Matthews. She's one big bad influence.

Fat Acceptance Movement: Destroying Their Own Bodies One Large Meal at a Time

 (Warning: Strong language galore, rants, and a TON of fat jokes ahead)

 

(If you are an easily offended snowflake, don't read this piece. You'll be offended within 10 seconds)

(This piece only uses the metric and kilogram scale for measurement)

 

            I don't know how this world works anymore. It seems like we as a society are heading towards an unprecedented level of total idiocracy, with clashing ideologies and a lot of people claiming to be "oppressed" (give me a break). I used to be sympathetic with some movements like the body positive movement, which in theory celebrates human bodies of all shapes and sizes. As per my statements in previous piece, my understanding of this movement is for people with conditions outside their control, whether physical deformities or disabilities as a direct result of irreparable injuries. But these days, the once peaceful movement has been hijacked by people who are basically too lazy and too ignorant to see the bigger picture. They elected to destroy their own bodies by eating too much and moving too less instead of bettering themselves, all in the name of body positivity.

 

            And yet, people who wants to speak out against this movement, called fat acceptance movement are called every fucking name under the sun, most notably "fatphobia" (for fuck's sake), "hater", and my favorite, "thin privilege". Well, thanks a fucking lot. The movement itself defined as a social movement seeking to eliminate the social stigma of fatness from social attitudes by pointing out to the general public the social obstacles faced by fat people. Again, in theory this seems like a good idea, but in reality, the movement itself has been viewed as a total wreck, from ignoring studies that clearly say that 60% of causes of death in the United States are linked to obesity to some degree, the act of body shaming against people who just want to be fit and healthy, to the apparent double standards enforced by these bulldozer-looking women. Yes. I said women, because according to this shit-for-brains fat activists (whom are all women for some reason), fat women are seen as beautiful and brave, whereas fat men are seen as disgusting fat fucks. Nothing more, and nothing less. Just disgusting fucks. This is what I have issue with to be honest. Like I said many times, I've lost too many of my family members for weight-related conditions. My uncle (rest his soul) passed away for several complications like high blood sugar and cholesterol, added to the fact that he, along with several family members from my mother's side, tends to gain weight easier. 

 

            The first one that grinds me heavily on this subject is the sheer hypocrisy of the body positive movement, as a direct result of the fat acceptance movement. For these overgrown rhinos, being a bit larger (well, a bit larger as in weighing like a literal elephant) than average is viewed as empowering, whereas people who like to stay fit, controlling their daily calorie intake and exercise ever so often are instead viewed as the enemy of the body positive movement, calling them "slaves of diet culture". First of all, diet is NOT A FUCKING CULTURE! It is only the way of someone eats on a day-to-day basis from food choices to portion sizes. People who have this kind of mindset is usually suffers from an alleged eating disorder appropriately named "binge eating disorder". You see, addictions of any kind are never good, much less doing something too much or too less. Whereas drugs, alcohol and sex addiction are viewed as bad, somehow, food addiction (mostly junk food in this case) is often overlooked, or in this case, rather encouraged. Virgie Tovar is the name that instantly came up to mind when I think about a "fat activist" who advocates for binge-eating without any guilt. This author, fat activist, and a literal sloth with flabby body parts actually encourages impressionable souls to each as much as they want without all the care in the world, continuously racking up kilograms until you end up on an episode of My 600-pound Life (or should I say, My 272-kilogram Life). Thanks Tovar, you utter jackass.

 

            The second thing that annoys me about this shitstorm is the term "heath at every size". Let me correct you overweight hippos right there. There are certain sizes that can be deemed medically as unhealthy, either you look like a literal twig like Eugenia Cooney (bless her heart, but she really needs to start eating more) with only skin and bones or being so huge, you create a tremor or a minor earthquake every time you take a step like Tess Holliday (sorry not sorry, lose some weight, you wrecking ball-looking woman, you are not a fashion model). Apparently this trainwreck of a movement has existed since the 1960s, but in 2008, a book of the same name written by (oh the fucking irony) a nutritionist named Linda Bacon (now Lindo Bacon, for some fucking reason) skyrocketed this movement to new heights. At first, what she said is completely sensible, by adopting good behaviors and to forget weight changing as a goal, and embrace the bodies that the people are living in. In theory, this movement is created to destigmatize people with extra kilos, but at the same breath, it's been overshadowed by the need to push that obesity is not unhealthy in any way (don't take my word for it). I believe that these panzer tank folks took Linda's (fuck it, I'm referring this person as Linda. If you want to scream bloody murder to me about transphobia, homophobia, or anything for that matter, be my fucking guest) words out of context and use them to weaponize their shit argument that you can be fat and being fit at the same time (which is an oxymoron). Hell, Linda herself even states that in order to win the war against fat is to give up the fight itself. Thanks Linda, you goddamn hypocrite.

 

            The last but not least, it's the SURPLUS amount of fucking toxicity plaguing this very movement. For influencers or celebrities advocating body positivity and health at every size who weights approximately three times the size of a hauler truck, they have this pressure to keep their image as a body positive advocate to never do anything that could insinuate "intentional weight loss". This is what happened to the singer Adelle. This fine lady at first was a bit bigger during her first 2 album cycles. Members of the fat acceptance community praised her for just being her, with all those extra fats. Then the bombshell dropped when she posted a photo on her Instagram page looking a lot thinner than before. In fact, she lost a whooping 45 kg (100 pounds). And you think that the community would still stand behind her after all this time, right? Well, you are DEAD. FUCKING. WRONG. She is swiftly denounced and subsequently blasted and hated by those walking cannon balls for "intentionally losing weight in the name of personal health". SHUT. THE. FUCK. UP. She's doing it for herself seeking no fucking approval from you oversized wankers who only wants to sit your fat asses down gorging on gross food. Hell, I'm starting to suspect that secretly, you all wanted to be like Nikocado Avocado, minus the OnlyFans stuff. All things aside, Adelle is thriving in her new appearance, pumping hit song after hit song after hit song. Thanks Adelle, you absolute legend. 

 

            I swear to The Almighty God, these fat activists, who weighs more than a fucking Formula 1 car (with the driver onboard, take George Russell or Esteban Ocon for example) are constantly pushing their shit message of "body positivity" by endorsing large corporations and forcing other people to make them a "safe space", and those who disagrees with them, even slightly is deemed fatphobic. One time I discovered a story about a beauty salon opened in 2017 catered specifically for women 272 kg and above. The owner of that salon is a woman weighing 225 kg named Jamie Lopez, who once broke a chair while visiting a beauty salon. Her countermeasures for her salon are to enforce the chairs inside the establishment, so they can support up to 362 kg of humanity. Aside from normal beauty services, customers (or in this case, hauler trucks) are served with mimosas and various sweet treats like cupcakes while being treated. Basically, only whales are allowed inside. I guess we should set up an earthquake station near that salon, because I reckon the seismic activities must be huge with all those large women around. Another one is when I discovered a TikTok page belonged to a "plus-size traveler" who once ranted about having to pay for extra seats just because the seat she booked couldn't fit her enormous cannonball size of a human body. I said this once in a video (which has since been deleted for "harassment and bullying", thanks a fucking lot, TikTok), and I'll say it again for good measure: Society doesn't owe you shit, but you owe society every-fucking-thing. If you want that extra seat, buy it like you would buy airplane seat for two! Don't pull your victim card when everything is not up to your delusional scenario.

 

            All I can say is, being positive about the body you are born with is not an unhealthy thing. It goes with the notion of self-love. By nourishing your body with all the necessary nutrients, you'll be able to live a healthier, more fulfilling life. One advice though, you should NEVER in any circumstance listen to these fat influencers. They don't really care about your well-being, much like they don't care about theirs either. In the end, the choices we made in live are matter the most for our well-being. And if you chose the wrong ones, then be prepared to suffer those irreversible consequences. Grow yourself and be an Adonis, not a Tess Holliday or a Virgie Tovar. If you think that behind this piece is a straight, white, American Christian man, you are dead wrong. I AM STRAIGHT, no surprise there, but I'm a brown-skinned Indonesian Muslim man. Eat your fucking heart out.

Hitting the Wall: The Painful Side Effect of Western Feminism

(Warning: Strong languages and sexual references ahead)

 

            Ah, feminism. The movement that once praised for granting women around the world the right to vote, right for education, and equality of opportunity as their male counterpart. The same movement that once advocate for women around the world to pursue their careers without sacrificing their fundamental role: raising the next generation. But nowadays, thanks to the fourth wave of this movement, it went from a trailblazing empowerment into an utter laughingstock, as women (at least in the Western hemisphere) who are so emboldened by the feminist movement, went from desirable to unattractive as they age, believing that their "strong and independent" mantra would work wonders attracting men.

 

            I want to proceed into this piece by saying that this is not about belittling the members of the opposite sex, but to highlight some of the problems plaguing the current Western society as a result of the modern-day feminism. And I am sorry ladies, but this is too hilarious to ignore, as a man myself. Now let's start with the first mantra of the current feminism movement: "Strong, independent boss babe." At this point, it's already clear that men and women are roughly equal when it comes to job opportunities. So much so, that women around the Western hemisphere boldly declare that they "no longer need men" to care for them. But when we talk about radical feminism, we also need to talk about the absolute double standard that they imposed onto the society. They claimed themselves to be independent, but when it comes to the dating scene, they expect everything and anything that they can get their hands on to be freely handed to them, with the expense of the man's financial stabilities. Moving from their "strong and independent mindset", we arrived at the one thing that any man with common sense have mutual hatred towards, modern dating disasters. Women nowadays are so in control over a man's romantic fate, one right swipe on a dating app would change a man's life forever, often times for the worse. And they did this with the help of social media algorithms. Women would often judge men by their material possessions, while men are judging women by their physical beauty. But on the inside, women are more emotional, whilst men could still think straight using their logics. Let me just put it this way: if a woman sees a tall, muscular, handsome man, she will do anything to grab his attention, even if that guy might have a literal harem on his expense. For these ladies, as long as he exhibits a "bad boy energy," she would smash him. But if a man meets a woman, he has to be convinced that this girl would stay with him long-term and willing to support him unconditionally. But if that woman claims herself to be a "strong and independent" who works two jobs and capable of sustaining herself (And I bet her second job involves OnlyFans, but who am I kidding) or that she has history of numerous infidelities with other men to the point of having multiple baby daddies, then the woman's value would sink faster than the Titanic ever did in the man's eye.

 

            The second aspect of why modern feminism works like the touch of King Midas, but instead of turning into gold, it turns everything into utter crap is the toxic dating advices offered by several female influencers on various social media platforms like TikTok. One of which is to treat the man that they're dating like a fucking walking ATM for every fucking shit that they want to get their hands on. This is prevalent around female social climber who can easily get those stuff on their own, but instead exploited a man for his fortunes. Once the charade's been broken, the man would simply just walk away. And this can unfortunately extend to the family system, as married men are susceptible of their wives' infidelity, and ended up losing every single penny they got, all because of the family courts system (in the Western hemisphere, mind you) that heavily favors women (PSA, do what Achraf Hakimi did before thinking of settling down with a woman). 

 

            Not only that, but there is one thing that the men are constantly in danger of, and this is one of the reasons why men are somewhat unsure if they want to enter the dating market. That threat is known as "paternity fraud". The premise of this crime is to name a random man as the father of the woman's child, fully aware that the same man might not be the one who performed the conception of said child, all in the name of financial advantage in the form of child support (this is mostly American cases). Hell, in some cases total strangers can be accused of this, and women are getting off scot-free at best, or just a mere slap in the wrist at worst. 

 

            These two points then, produced two side effects that would bite the modern feminists in their botox-infused ass. One of which is the "Men Going Their Own Way" Movement. This movement is basically men who want nothing to do with women in terms of serious relationship or financial stability. Blue Collar Men are fed up with constant female manipulation, gaslighting, and outright abuse they have to endure while in a relationship. So, they decide to simply walk away from it all. refusing any female advancement encountered along the way and rekindle their sense of "brotherhood" where "bros coming first before hoes". They essentially leave the "Chads" and "Tyrones" to do the dirty work for them and flip the script on these women to teach them a lesson on how not to mess around a man's genuine romantic feelings.

 

            And finally, is the rise of the "Passport Bros" movement. The premise is pretty simple and straightforward. Basically, a Western man going overseas in search for a better life, and consequently, a woman who still values family over herself. You know, those "traditional wife" types. This movement exist as the breaking point of men who are tired of being exploited, tossed aside, and shunned, all in the name of "empowering womanhood" (oh for fuck's sake, knock the fuck off). And what did they do? They applied for a passport, book a one-way ticket to any country around the world, whether it's the Latin America (Colombia, Peru, Brazil, and the like) or it can be as far as any Eastern hemisphere country (mostly either Thailand, The Philippines or anywhere in Southeast Asia or Greater Asian continent as far as my knowledge). And I wonder how the fuck these privileged feminazis kept on crying wolf about their men boarding planes to find love somewhere else, when all those same women did to them at home soil is nothing more than physical, economical, and mental exploitation.

 

            And then this, in turn, led to a state when these "strong and independent" women felt like used goods, tossed aside past their prime. This state is known as the women "hitting the wall." Of course, as an anthropologist who pretends to be a linguist myself, this is a metaphorical term for women aged 35 and up and still unmarried, living by themselves. They were fed these sugar-coated pieces of piping hot cow shit by the feminazis that they are strong, independent queens who doesn't need a man, and when she wants a man, it's for her own benefit and not for true love and affection. This phenomenon is currently and rapidly rising amongst Western women who just don't know better. Even with the rise of the passport bros movement, they even spew the "I don't need men" rhetoric if they see a Filipina woman living happily with an American man, although that statement, and that attitude at large would come back and bite them in the oversized, botox-filled ass. 

 

            I guess I should reiterate that marriages, or any other form of romantic relationships in general, works both ways for the man and the woman. Men is traditionally seen as a breadwinner, working outside the home to provide for his family. The women, although nowadays can enter the workforce, are also have important role as a homemaker, which consists of cooking, cleaning, and provide emotional, personal, and intimate support to their man. Men provide the family with financial stability (with the help from his wife, mind you), and the women provide emotional and intimate support. And this is the one aspect modern women have destroyed in the wake of modern-day feminism and the #MeToo movement. Men are no longer investing for a long-term relationship or even to meet women at all. They see this as obsolete now, and women are now suffering form the unintended consequences of their own movement.

 

            I guess since the #MeToo movement, Western men are constantly walking on eggshells to the point that they are not bothered to seek romantic relationship in Western soil. Now, those same men are flocking into Latin American region and the continent of Asia or Africa for a better lease of life. For those who are unlucky enough to obtain a passport themselves, they simply just stand up and walk away, giving absolutely zero fucks about women. Since #MeToo, men are loudly saying #NotMe. You might think that this is just a delusion of grandeur, but this is the unintended consequences of modern-day feminism. And as men, we are comfortable with this now. 

Jeffrey Marsh: "Trans" Groomer on the Loose

 (Warning: Strong languages, sexually explicit and distressing references ahead)

 

            I can't believe I have to write this. For weeks I tried to steer clear from this man and this subject. But now, people from the left and the right side of the political spectrum are made aware of this man's online presence. And believe me when I say that aside of what he identifies himself with, child grooming is a heinous form of child exploitation. But then again, I lost pretty much all respect I have for most of the members of the LGBTQ community, particularly those who want to shove this gender ideology bullshit to others with differing opinions, as well as silencing those who are opposing the narrative, whether they are on their side or not. Ever since the puberty blocker debacle, and the fact that people like Dylan Mulvaney is roaming around unchecked appropriating womanhood (Yes, this is what I call gender appropriation), today's political landscape has become a free-for-all, as the (in)tolerant left press on to instill their deranged version of inclusivity. 

 

            I believe I've written something about sketchy individuals and people with a tendency of predatorial behavior, but what I'm about to dive into not only is a creep, but also acknowledge himself as one, and people actually support him. Let's begin by dissecting who are we dealing with. The one in question is Jeffrey Marsh, born in York, Pennsylvania, USA, on the 7th of July 1977. He claimed to have been misunderstood during his so-called "rough childhood". Not much information regarding his education history, but he attended the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, earning himself the Bachelor of Fine Arts in musical theater. Before his internet infamy, he moved to New York City to pursuit a career in cabaret performance. 

 

            After this, Marsh turned to social media, with his first platform being the now defunct Vine, creating contents around self-affirming and self-empowering, usually presented with a pep-talk, song, or dance. Nowadays, he has a TikTok account (which we'll be getting into later on), Instagram, Facebook, even a YouTube channel. Lately, he also set up a Patreon account. Outside of his social media activities, he is a regular contributor to The Huffington Post, arguably one if not the most woke publication ever existed beside BuzzFeed. In 2016, he even released a book entitled How to Be You, supposedly inspired by his time growing up. He identifies himself as "non-binary" (which is, again, pretty much an undeniable sign that you are a total idiot) and is of Buddhism faith. For one, I might get branded as a blasphemous little bastard, but Buddha himself would laugh at your fucking ass.

 

            Now, let's address the elephant in the room. Marsh is currently the biggest LGBT influencer on TikTok, amassing 682.000 followers. Most of the time, the contents are not really that harmful, except that those same videos contain an intro SPECIFICALLY aimed towards children. Hell, he begins his videos with "hi kids" or some variation of that phrase. Now, we all know where this is going. We've seen too many true crime videos to not noticing straight away that this intro, more or less, is a MAJOR RED FLAG FOR CHILD GROOMING. These particular offenders are trying to establish communication to children by isolating them from their parents. And as I learned first-hand, parents are the strongest defense mechanism against these abusive tactics. 

 

            The second thing that I want to address is the contents themselves. Recently, Marsh's content is revolving around teaching those same kids on how to go no contact from their parents. Again, isolate them for your own benefit later on, and once the trust has been established, then the groomer can do whatever to the kids as they pleased, often for a long period of time. Or, if the audience is equally as demented as he is, they might be onboard as well. Then, to make things worse, his Patreon page contains videos containing OUTRIGHT SEXUAL TOPICS! AND THIS IS AIMED TO CHILDREN! For fuck's sake, this man has too many free times on his hands. And to drive this thing home, the left actually supports him, as he kept roaming around the Internet unchecked, while differing opinions are constantly shut down.

 

            And why is Jeffrey Marsh is allowed to do this? Isn't sexual topics towards children is heavily frown upon? Unfortunately, no. As the British Muslim comedian Shumirun Nessa found out firsthand. She initially made a series of videos on TikTok calling Marsh's contents into question, on how these types of videos is allowed to be viewed by minors. All she did was criticize his content, not for what he is, a "non-binary" man. But what did she get? Jeers and angry comments from his supporters and "trans activists" that extend as far as literal threats. Just two days ago, Indonesian time zone, she was doxed by some unknown perpetrators with emails containing her daily routines, her daughters' school details, and her residence address. She also had her car vandalized prior to those threats. I mean, we are on an uncharted territory here, consider that Marsh is that type of guy who is willing to do the most heinous shit not even the crazed GG Allin would think of, and that is saying something. 

 

            If this is what "inclusivity", "tolerance", and "loving community" are about, I'm jumping off the fucking train. I'd rather be labeled as a "bigot" for standing up to traditional values, that men are born with a penis and a set of testicles, and women are born with a vagina and a uterus. I'd rather be called a "backwards redneck" for sticking to my religious values, which Shumirun and I both share wholeheartedly. I'd rather be called an "ignorant jackass" for standing up for those who are fed up with this gender ideology bullshit. In short, Jeffrey Marsh is a creep, a jackass, an offender, and a total idiot. Parents, if you are reading this, keep your children safe. Question everything. Don't let this creep into your children's life. The consequences are both devastating and irreversible. Now if you excuse me, I'm off to lock myself in my room playing Hogwarts Legacy, the most "transphobe" game made in association with the most "transphobe" a. k. a. the most badass woman in the (wizarding) world, Joanne Kathleen Rowling.

What's Wrong with J. K. Rowling?

 (Warning: Rants ahead)

 

            Alright, I'm writing this as an OG Harry Potter fan, a Gryffindor, and as a someone who desperately wants to relive his own childhood reading the books and watching those movies. For the most of my life, Harry Potter took me into a magical world of magic and miracles and witnessed the struggle of The Boy Who Lived as he navigated his life as a student at Hogwarts. Hell, I might have been fantasizing myself waiting for that letter to come, as well as me being the all-powerful wizard and some. All thanks to one woman known as Joanne Rowling, or J. K. Rowling. The woman is a trailblazer, capable of captivating readers young and old, and as such, manages to pull them into this fantasy world we all come to know and love. 

 

            From the moment she put her pen down to draft the initial story until present day, the Harry Potter series remains as Rowling's magnum opus when it comes to popular culture. From what appears to be a fantasy story about a boy who discovered his magical talents quickly evolved into one if not the biggest franchises the world has ever seen. Hell, The Wizarding World (then known as Pottermore), the in-universe site created by Rowling herself, is still active to this day. I can still vividly recall every moment in either the books or the movies that can still resonate with me years later. I can name almost every character, friend or foe, and the facts surrounding them (note: Dolores Jane Umbridge remains as the most hated character in the franchise, not even Voldemort can surpass her). Everyone is invested in this franchise, even A-List celebrities. And this didn't come easy for her either. She had to endure domestic abuse from her ex-husband, even went so far as to file for a restraining order. Since then, she juggled her life writing the books and being a single parent to her daughter. Luckily, she now lives a happy life remarried and blessed with two more kids. And with that, I have nothing but respect and admiration for her. 

 

            But nowadays, Jo Rowling is mostly known for her rather controversial (read: sensible) comments around several topics, and most of them are quite sensitive. But the most notable one is her views on gender and the LGBT issues. Just to deviate from the main focus for a bit, I was quite shellshocked about Rowling's revelation that the Headmaster of Hogwarts Albus Dumbledore was a gay man, that aspect further explored in the two prequel movies from the Fantastic Beasts series, titled The Crimes of Grindelwald and The Secrets of Dumbledore. Although I am mostly neutral, but to silently inserting this character aspect into a literature aimed mostly to children is uncalled for. But on recent times, Rowling found herself against the LGBT progressive agenda. It all began in 2018, just because of a tweet she liked that said, "transgender women are men in dresses." Instead of apologizing and bend the knee for the woke mob, this badass woman doubled down on her remarks. One time, she mercilessly mocked an article by Devex called Opinion: Creating a More Equal Post-COVID-19 World for People Who Menstruate by tweeting this gem which says: "‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?" And this is coming from a self-identified feminist too.

 

            This then opened the storm of hate towards Rowling, even some of the actors who played in the movie came forward to criticize her. As of now, the woke mob branded her as the head of TERF, an acronym for "Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists" and has since shunned from the elite. Several names then came for her support, like fellow Potter alumni Ralph Fiennes, a. k. a. Lord Voldemort himself, to legendary comedian Dave Chappelle, who briefly discussed this on his comedy special The Closer. During the Harry Potter 20th Anniversary Special, she was excluded from the main feature, and only replaced by archival footages, supposedly to disassociate the franchise from the woman who created it. As the time of writing, a new controversy rises in the form of Hogwarts Legacy, which is a role-playing video game for next-gen consoles and PC which takes place during the 1890s, during the reign of Phineas Nigellus Black as headmaster. For crying out loud, the game has not even released yet, but the woke "activists" (I just call them inconsequential hacks with too much free time) have already started a smear campaign by various boycotts and false user-tagging. If it's up to her, she could kill off the franchise herself singlehandedly by writing a new story in which the ending features Harry's death in gruesome fashion and the destruction of Hogwarts (I hope this never happens). 

 

            But here is the rebuttal: The woke agenda is basically the only thing that runs the world these days. Science are being disproven in favor of someone's personal feelings, languages being massacred all because of someone's boneheaded insistences to use plural pronouns to refer an individual who feels beyond the gender binary, and big corporations benefiting themselves by pandering to these privileged groups. Statements like what Jo Rowling said over the past year or two used to be the norm, the mutual understanding of the masses. Now, it's nothing but hateful, transphobic, homophobic, and racist remarks that a TERF would spew, and must be cancelled. What she did is only stating the basic, scientifically proven fact that those who are capable of bringing a life to the world by the form of childbirth is not to be called "a pregnant person" or "people who menstruate". Let's just call them as it is: women. Yes. Transgenders do exist, and they deserve a better life, but let's look at the most fundamental differences: Trans women are not capable of childbirth, and trans men are significantly weaker physically than biological men. 

            And to close this piece, let's answer Matt Walsh's legendary question: What is a woman? A woman in my few is someone who has the capability of childbirth, known for her empath, tender, love and care. A woman is someone who carries two X chromosomes inside her DNA. A woman is a female human being known for her femininity traits. And lastly, a woman is the creature of God who are willing to put her life in danger to raise us, nurture us, and guide us in this world. For all women out there, your voices matter. Don't let the woke mob silence you. They are only using real women's voice for their own benefit. And for that reason, I consider Joanne Kathleen Rowling to be the most badass woman the world has ever seen.

BreadTube: The Cesspool of Woke Propaganda

 (Warning: Strong languages and rants ahead)

 

            Goodness gracious, forgive me for I have sinned, My Good Lord above. This piece is about as cringeworthy as it is nauseating. I can easily say that everyone who engages in far-left, ultra-socialism, borderline communism deserves to be tossed off a cliff into a shark-infested ocean. There, I fucking said it. As someone whose country was almost hijacked by the communist ideology, I can safely say that this ideology, with everything surrounding it, is demented.

 

            But fuck me dead, the Internet has plethora of far-left discourses, opinions, even ideologies circulating in every corner, and this is also the case with YouTube. Granted, videos came and went in this platform, and for most of the time, everyone can speak up their mind, but there is one dark corner of the very far-left side of YouTube, where content creators gather up in a party of far-left propaganda enhanced by the algorithm to bring forth their communist-infused rules and at the same time, positioning themselves as the "thought police". This corner of YouTube is known as "BreadTube". I don't know about you who are reading this, but I think that is a pretty lame word to be used as a name. But there is a reason why this lame movement is named as such. The name derived itself from a book by Peter Kropotkin titled The Conquest of Bread, a book described by Kropotkin himself as an "anarcho-socialist book", since he himself is a self-described anarchist. There is a dispute of the origins of this movement, but there is arguably a starting point where the left-wing creators started their channels in opposition to anti-SJW ones that gained traction in mid-2010s. It is often used as a comedic alternative to the less-known term "LeftTube". Content creators under the banner of BreadTube usually posts video essays or vlogs talking about the hottest issues and discourses, but presented them through the far-left lenses, from liberalism, socialism, and even anarchism. There is a bit of a competition between the left-wing YouTube and the right-wing ones, both are extremely political, both are said to be complete opposite of each other, and both sides are equally influential. If the conservative side have The Daily Wire, then the liberal side have Natalie Wynn, also known as ContraPoints. 

 

            These types of contents, as you would expect, are skewed according to their political compass, some of them to the extreme. Take Ian Kochinski, or Vaush, as people know him online. He's one of the more prominent BreadTuber who holds many controversial stances, including stances on sexual relationships. Here's what grinds my gears about this neckbearded cocksucker: He holds the stance that sexual relationships towards minors should be legalized, even the circulation of child pornography should also be allowed, with the basis of today's society are using hardware devices or clothes manufactured by child workers. He is not above throwing insults and baseless allegations to get his point across either. During his feud with Isaac Butterfield (my favorite Australian comedian. Check out his channel if you have some spare time), Vaush implied that "Australianism is a disease", supposedly a backhanded joke about Butterfield's national identity as a proud Aussie. He also insinuated that by looking at the way Isaac presented himself in front of the camera, the comedian is also (allegedly) a child groomer. And then there is Noah Samsen, who also called out Butterfield's "fatphobic" tendencies, which not only falls on deaf ears, the bearded legend proceeded to tear him a new one while also affirming the stance that modern body positivity movement is nothing more than a glorification of morbid obesity, despite the efforts put forth by these alleged Kim Jong-un's ass sniffers. More recent shithousery by the leftist jackasses on this platform was by Ethan Klein, on his podcast H3H3 Productions, who mocked and attacked the recently Muslim-revert Andrew Tate (Thank Almighty God for that). In response, the man known as either the Top G or the most censored man in the world fires back at Klein's form who, compared to Tate, being a champion kickboxer, is more like a bag full of fat.

 

            I don't really understand anymore at this point. They claimed themselves to be anti-racism and anti-xenophobic, but based on those two above, I sense nothing but hypocrisy. Others are expert in manipulating words to make them sound like they are the smartest people in the room. Mr. Beard used this tactic while supposedly "destroyed" Butterfield while also calling out his "apparent" misogyny. There is no shortage of insults either; his video title outright attacks Butterfield by calling him "Australia's dumbest comedian." And low and behold, the man Isaac referred to as Ralph Wiggum (from The Simpsons) proceeded to mock him by poorly copying (or should I say appropriating) his Australian accent. Other times involving cutting out some parts of their target's content in order to manipulate the audience that what their targets are saying is inflammatory and racist, and not giving enough time to explain in what context those statements are made for. And thanks to these types of videos, I am enlightened on how shit the woke movement is, on how demented those people who claimed to be tolerant, and those who claimed to be against the establishment, but in reality, that same group of people are turned out to be corporate ass lickers. 

 

            BreadTubers, as it turns out, are heavily involved in the modern progressive movements, it means, in every progressive echo chamber, BreadTubers exists inside every single one of them. people like Vaush, Samsen, Mr Beard, and even Xanderhal are basing everything according to the US political dichotomy. Just recently, the backlash in the back of the new The Little Mermaid trailer posted by Disney by both fans and critics alike, for the reinterpretation of Ariel the Little Mermaid, who instead being played by an actress of color. Although never specified, the past interpretations of this character have always been white girl with a red hair. BreadTubers argued that the backlash in question is amplified by "racist trolls" and "conservative influencers". These are their go to trigger words in order to pull the Internet mob to side with them. Ironically, consider today's discourse climate, it's them along with others with similar views are actually racists themselves, exhibited by them favoring more about Persons of Color and LGBT movement. Hell, nowadays people are judged by their skin color, sexual orientation, and their body size (don't forget the fatties here). Those who are born either black, a woman (according to them, obviously), trans, nonbinary, have larger than life bodies or the combination of all those things are celebrated just because of their treats alone, not for academic, sporting, or other achievements. Those who were born white, a man, cisgender, and fit or slim are vilified because, again, according to these guys, they were born privileged. They wanted to be presented as an ally to the political left with a seriously twisted ulterior motives. Let's look at Vaush again, who confessed himself to align with the feminist movement so he can sleep with as many women as he wants. 

 

            In the end, BreadTube is nothing more than acid pool of woke moralism, with the extra sprinkle of Marxism, Socialism, Anarchism and all the things associated with far-left liberalism. They are ready to attack anyone who isn't in line with their demented opinions by bullying them systematically to the corner until their targets caved in and join their side. What used to be a healthy discussion between differing opinions has now turned into a hellscape of censorship and pseudo-moralism. Seriously, go jump off a cliff.

Dylan Mulvaney: The Epitome of Mockery

 (Warning: Strong language, sex and body shaming jokes, and rants ahead)

 

            Oh, God. I don't know what in the world is going on anymore. Between my current activities as a magistrate student and my researching activities, the world keeps on evolving with new ideas and discourses. But unfortunately, the evolution in question, instead of going forward, it would only go backwards. At this stage, we all are in course to become the society of simple minds and propaganda, as depicted in the 2006 movie Idiocracy. But what set this world and Idiocracy apart, unfortunately, is the level of stupidity the society had showed over the years. In the movie, despite most of the population is literally illiterate, they are not as bad as today society, not with those left-wing discourse and narratives being pushed into the masses every single day and working hour. And this is not limited to gender issues. I touched this issue some weeks ago while discussing the Muslim community's pushback against LGBTQ books being made available to kids as young as a grade schooler, and for this piece, we will dive into the life of a man who is deluded enough to think that he is actually a girl.

 

            Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you Dylan Mulvaney. he was born in San Diego, California, USA on the 29th of December 1996, and was raised as a Christian. There is no further information regarding his upbringing, family member, or even a spouse, that is, accounting the fact that he rarely disclose his relationship status. But there is some info on his educational history, where he attended the University of Cincinnati-Conservatory of Music and earning a BFA in musical theatre. Many would recognize him as a theatrical actor in his heydays, but not until his TikTok days people would discover him. 

 

            It all started when he first uploaded his "Days of Girlhood" video, where he detailed that he has been crying three times, wrote an email that he didn't send, ordered some dresses that he couldn't afford, and whether he's been asked on how he was feeling, his answer was "I'm fine." For fuck's sake man, you are creepier than Jeffrey Dahmer, or Jimmy Savile in that matter. He first identified himself as "nonbinary" prior to this stunt, which is a tell-tale sign that someone is a total idiot beyond salvation. This walking twig with a wig and a meat pole then started this series on TikTok, complete with an exaggerated stereotypical behavior of a high school girl with a princess syndrome. He even carries tampons and other feminine hygiene products, when in fact, his biological built is basically comprised of a penis and two testicles. Seriously, if this is the direction that our society is heading, we will be driving straight off a cliff. In fact, this is so out of control, another transgender celebrity, Caitlyn Jenner (formerly Bruce Jenner) criticize Mulvaney when one of his "day of girlhood" videos posted by him detailed Mulvaney's effort to "normalize the bulge" on women. First of all, you stupid cunt, women don't have a bulge, men do. And for you to casually say that to be normalize among other biological women is disgusting. Hilarity ensues when several conservative commentators take jabs at this beef, and especially Mulvaney's content as a whole, particularly Daily Wire's Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, Michael Knowles, and Andrew Klavan. Walsh in particular, fresh off his critically acclaimed documentary appropriately titled What is a Woman? pointed out Jenner's response on that video, stating that he (Mulvaney) should not normalize any of the dumpster fire he's spewing, and that he has a penis himself. The Jewish legend that is Ben pointed out Mulvaney's visit to President Joe Biden, and their conversation about trans rights issues (what they mean is medical and chemical castration of kids). Several weeks before the beef with Jenner, Mulvaney appeared in a video of an episode of The Reality Of... by Ulta Beauty, discussing his vulnerabilities and his desires of womanhood, which is biologically impossible for him since HE WAS BORN AND RAISED A FUCKING MAN. I guess what Michael Knowles said about him is right on the money. He needs a priest, and he needs a fucking exorcism. Hell, I would gladly stand in front of him, reciting the Quran until he gives up on his delusions, and I'm going to need Andrew Tate's help to shape him into a Top G.

 

            Again, the way this world works right now is nothing short of an irony. If someone has a differing position on critical issues, they are instantly de-platformed, cancelled, and sent into the abyss of obscurity, and if someone is in line with the woke agenda, they will be praised and regarded as an icon. Honestly, watching all these TikTok videos makes me feel appalled. We all know that men and women are not the same. women are more of an empath; men are more rigid. Men are physically taller, bigger, stronger, and faster. Women are more caring, gentle, and more agile. And guys like Dylan Mulvaney and Jeffrey Marsh (another "nonbinary" idiot) served as a harrowing warning to us about the importance of instilling your kids with the correct values and norms, and to guide them as they navigate themselves into this world full of deceptions and propaganda. And if anything, they should not be drenched in admiration, it should be straight to the asylum on a strait jacket, and a kick in the nuts for good measure. And as I finish this piece, I need to lock myself up for the sake of my mental well-being after watching those videos. And to close this, borrowing a quote from an Australian comedy legend, Dylan Mulvaney, fuck you to the moon.

"Minor-Attracted Persons": Paedos in Disguise

 (Warning: Strong languages, graphic sexual description, and rants ahead)

 

            Just when you thought that the world just could not get any crazier, this shit came up on my feed as I sit down at my university campus for another lecture (I'm taking masters by the way). I want to touch on this subject for a long time now, but this is somehow too sensitive of a topic, even according to my own standards. It is not a secret that the ultra-left side of the political spectrum tends to spew crazy rhetoric after crazy rhetoric in order to steer the normal population and manipulating them into believing those ludicrous ideas. This included human sexuality. For years I have been witnessing the strange turn inside the LGBT+ community, from an innocent aspiration of just want to live their lives normally to this sheer insanity of trying to legitimize immoral sexual practices that has been banned or at least being frown upon for years.

 

            And now, there is another crazy ideology spewed by the lunatic jackasses of the far left, and it involves some of the most heinous criminals ever existed. Something like the white-haired fuckwit from Leeds, England Jimmy Savile (who, thankfully, is dead and currently rotting inside his shit-invested grave) or Glam Rocker turned sex offender Gary Glitter would do during their peak and prime. And the term in question known as "minor-attracted person". This term was coined by a university professor, of all people, named Dr. Allyn Walker. This "nonbinary" person (in reality this is a woman who has too much testosterone in her body with a fragile obsession to be masculine) who used to teach at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, USA argued that the term "pedophile" (which is the adequate term to describe these offenders in the first place) is deemed "too harsh" for "all persons attracted to minors" It seems like from her statement alone, this term is basically an umbrella term for sexual attractions toward minors. 

 

            First of all, what is this thing known as "pedophiles"? It's basically a condition where someone is sexually attracted to prepubescent children, mostly under the age of 13 years. It is also a self-discovered condition which grow stable over time, and often referred as a sexual preference disorder. It is still unknown what caused this type of disorder to develop in the first place, but we do know that it starts developing when someone hit puberty, where they start developing attractions to the opposite sex. It is commonly classified as a form of sexual deviation disorder known as "paraphilic disorders", as with many acts of indecency like the one I explored few months back. These heinous acts are not limited to outright sexual practices either. Other forms of abuse included child pornography, child grooming, indecent exposure, stalking, and statutory rape. This is based on various laws about age of consent. While the universally agreed age of consent is 18 years old, some countries are lower, mostly around 15-17 years old. For example, when it comes to statutory rape, any sexual activity involving a minor can be considered as such, if the other party is below the age of consent, thus legally unable to give consent to those activities. 

 

            There are some personality traits of pedophilia examined among sex offenders, particularly towards children. Studies conducted suggested that it often concurs with other traits such as low self-esteem and depression. But there are some differences when it comes to traits among those two, and that is what the left-wing media is trying to point out. According to them, sex offenders are certainly can be pedophiles, but those who are said to be born with it can decide to not follow through their desires. A first, this seems make sense, since some of them are describing themselves as "anti-contact" or "non-offending", meaning that despite their awareness of their attraction, they chose not to engage with it. But this is where the problem actually began. 

 

            I think this speaks volumes when I said that sexual attraction to someone under the universal age of consent of 18 years is viewed as immoral as it can be. Even in some cases, there are laws that allowed capital punishment for child sex offenders, like the ones introduced in India, or the recent chemical castration laws passed in Indonesia. But in the West, especially in the US, where the division between liberals and conservatives are way evident, it seems that the mainstream media and the liberal left are gunning for legalization of alternate human sexuality, and that include these creepy fucks under the umbrella term "minor-attracted people". First of all, whoever suggested this needs to be put down and tossed to a shark-infested pool. Secondly, if this "thing" becomes the norm, that means the human race has lost every ounce of its core values. People like Savile will be considered as a hero once again, and there might be another, more vicious Jimmy Savile’s, Gary Glitters or R Kelly's in the future. 

 

            There are some cases of these "MAPs" being recorded in recent times, and it almost always involving big-time celebrities or someone in the position of power. Take for instance actor Ezra Miller. The actor who self-identifies as "nonbinary" (fuck this shit, honestly) was involved in a scandal where he allegedly groomed an 18-year-old girl (who was convinced by him to think that she was nonbinary as well) since she turned 12 years old. He allegedly groomed her in a cult-like behavior. He also allegedly stuffed her with drugs and alcohol and exhibiting a pattern that is akin of "corrupting a minor". Despite this, Miller's career remained unaffected initially since his status as a "nonbinary" celebrity apparently acts like a free-pass card to sketchy behavior. This jackass even has the fucking audacity to actually scold a Hawaiian police officer arresting him for "misgendering" him. At the time, he was arrested for an assault on a woman. One word for Ezra Miller from yours truly, shut up and take responsibility, you weird cunt. And then there is R Kelly. This singer turned sex trafficker was sentenced to 30 years of incarceration for racketeering and sex trafficking of women and children. And his track record goes way before those allegations came to light. Remember the late singer and Actress Aaliyah? That one fine woman who starred in the movie Queen of the Damned? The sick fuck married her in 1994 when she was 15 years old! He forged the legal documents to falsify her age, at the time listed as 18. Thankfully it was annulled months later. 

 

            And yet these brain-dead liberals are still on about these "MAPs" and how they are suffering from their condition. I have to say that these people truly need help, but for the love of God, please don't normalize these behaviors! It will only embolden them to commit even the most heinous crimes, those even Ted Bundy would shiver. It is immoral and demented, and should be frown upon at least, and persecuted at most. And the crazy thing about this is they are somewhat included under the LGBT+ umbrella, which means if we call out these behaviors (which is clearly immoral), we would be branded as a bigot, homophobe, transphobe and a racist almost instantly. But it is a reality of this world ruled by wokeness. Anything and everything are wrong, and freedom of speech only applies if the statements are in line with their sick agenda. Hell, those who actually worked in mental care (a fucking "sex therapist" in this case) actually condone these sick fucks, even encourage them (here's the short video on YouTube if you want to know what I mean).

 

            What can I say about these "minor-attracted persons"? It means that those who are attracted to children EXCLUSIVELY. They are some if not the most heinous criminals of all time, those that would made Idi Amin or the aforementioned Savile look like a saint. It is morally demented, inappropriate, and should be purged at all costs. Parents, if you are reading this, make sure to keep your children safe. Their future should not be wrecked by these paedos disguising themselves under this term.